Ray Bradbury said, ""

Tuesday, May 31, 2005
Liberty Dog's commenters on freedom

Liberty Dog posted a brief fisking of a couple commenters' statements about a supposed conflict between the "common good" and what they called "freedom."

One commenter said, "To live in a world of utter freedom would be to live in a world where every debased appetite could find expression, all in the name of liberty."

Another commenter said, "I believe I speak for the overwhelming majority of the nation as well as most of the Founding Fathers when I say that the Constitution was never meant to protect freedom of depriving rights to other citizens while realizing one's own."

This is a perversion of the words "freedom" and "liberty."

Here are the definitions which are adopted by our Founders and the vast majority of libertarians, whether Randian, Hayekian, Rothbardian, or Jeffersonian, or other variants. I will highlight those portions of the definitions which conform to the usage as limited by libertarians.

Funk and Wagnall's 1949 New Standard Dictionary of the English language:

Common: 1.  Belonging or pertaining equally to more than one, or to many indefinitely.  2. Belonging to all,  that is, either to the human race generally, or to all the people of a certain country, region, or locality; general; universal; public.

Liberty: 1. The state of being exempt from the domination of others, or from restricting circumstances: opposed to slavery, subjugation, or bondage; as Liberty of speech or trade

Webster's 1938 Universal Unabridged Dictionary

Free: 1. Being at liberty; not being under necessity or restraint, physical or moral. 2.  In government, not restrained; not in a state of vassalage or dependance; subject only to fixed laws, made by consent, and to a regular administration of such laws; not subject to the arbitrary will of some sovereign or lord. 3.  Instituted by a free people or by consent or choice of those who are to be subjects, and securing private rights and privileges set by fixed laws and principles; not arbitrary or despotic.

Webster's New Twentieth Century Unabridged Dictionary

Free: 1. Not under the control of  some other person or arbitrary power; able to act or think without compulsion or arbitrary restriction; having liberty; independant. 2. Having or existing under a government that does not impose arbitrary restrictions on the right to speak, assemble, petition, vote, etc.

Liberty: 1. Freedom or release from slavery, imprisonment, captivity, or any other form of arbitrary control. 2. The sum of rights and exemptions possessed in common by the people of a community, state, etc.

The phrase "common good," can only mean the universal welfare of each individual, the equal protection of rights, and is incompatible with the violation of the rights of some for the benefit of others.  It can have no other meaning unless one defines "common," so as not to mean equally applicable to each individual, that the good of each individual requires that harm come to some individuals. To do so is to transform the phrase into an arbitrary claim that some individuals are fodder for the violence and amusement of others, and to uphold this parasitic relation as a universal claim to liberty.

Liberty and freedom are negative principles: the absence of the initiation of coercion, the arbitrary will of another exerted by force; and the defense of this condition against those who would force their will on others. To claim that liberty is restricted by such a "common" good, is to maintain that liberty is applicable to only a portion of the society, and that some individuals can claim to initiate coercion against others. It is to divorce liberty from its origin in the nature of all men, and to redefine it in terms of what those privileged few view the "common good." It is to rob these words of their meaning and to use them in propagandistic fashion toward their antithesis: the use of coercion according to the arbitrary will of some, according to laws which are not fixed, but which flow from a mutable concept of "common good," which claims applicability to a limited portion of the population. It is a deceitful expropriation of the words of liberty toward what boils down to someone claiming a privilege to violence.

 "Utter freedom" could mean no more than the "utter lack of the initiation of violence against men by their fellow men, the utter limitation of force by fixed and isonomic laws toward the protection of rights." To expand the concept of "freedom" to include acts of coercion against others, is to include the antithesis of freedom, and to deprive it of all meaning. To use the word "freedom," where one means "infringing the freedom of others," is another attempt to limit the concept of freedom to be applicable only to a few by rendering it meaningless- to transform it from a negative concept to a positive concept, and to divorce it from its origin in the nature of man.

These limited usages are nonsensical and harmful. They advance violence in the name of peace, violation of rights in the name of protection of rights, and arbitrary, specific law in the name of fixed and isonomic law. They are useless in arguing with those who more honestly term their belief that humans can and should live under threat of force. You cannot argue for freedom proper with a communist if you use the word in the same way he does. It is not an excuse to plead carelessness with one's words.

If I err, drop a comment.

Update 2:11 am: I added a semicolon where needed, and restated "initiation of force," as "the arbitrary will of another exerted by force," for clarification.

Posted by: Tom "The Pooklekufr" Treloar at May 31, 2005 22:43 EST | Permalink | comments (4) |
libertarianism

Comments open but moderated. I reserve permission to kill spammers on sight.


Comments:
#1  31 May 2005 - 23:37
 
and if you're spot-on can I punt a comment?
ishcabibble
Anonymous
#2  01 June 2005 - 13:14
 
republicans want to take away that liberty we hold so strong to...
Anonymous
#3  02 June 2005 - 01:12
 
Commentor #2...by "we" do you mean Democrats? If so, your statement is laughable, because the Dems have absolutely ZERO respect for liberty. At least the Reps give it lip service.

Neither is on firm ground in the area of liberty and if you believe otherwise I would be interested in hearing your twisted definition of the word "liberty."
Anonymous
#4  04 June 2005 - 09:45
 
"Common Good" and "Freedom" are opposites in my book, except if people have freedom, it will be the best situation for the "Common good" ;)
Anonymous
Comments:
blog pager

This site is a member of WebRing.
To browse visit Here.

My Other Blogs

Pooklekufr Unix

Editor for the Grey Gods

Recent comments

About this blog

Tell the FEC to sod off with the Gadsden Flag

I pledge to disobey the FEC

You're in a No Israel-Bashing Zone

Hamsterwheel graphics by Liberty Dog

Fuzzy hamster and cat graphics by Travis Benning

Metallic hamstermotor graphics by Cooltext

Imageshack

About me

User: Pooklekufr
Name: Tom Treloar
Please allow me to introduce myself. I am a man of little wealth and poor taste.

My Technorati Profile

Gmail
Gmail pic created here

Go check out my old blog

What I'm Reading

Some via the Online Library of Liberty and the
Gutenberg Project:

The Essential Turing

E. T. Jaynes' Probability Theory

F.D. Lewis' Essentials of Theoretical Computer Science

Steven Tanimoto's Elements of Artificial Intelligence

Michael Kearns' The Computational Complexity of Machine Learning

Gregory Chaitin's Metamath: the quest for Omega

Cormen et. al. Introduction to Algorithms

Sanjeed Arora's Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach

Gregory Benford's Cosm

Lou Anders' Futureshocks

S. Dasgupta's Algorithms

What I'm Watching

Be My Netflix Friend

Who I'm Listening to

Miriam Makeba

Skip James

Abbot Kinney Lighthouse Choir

Blind Lemon Jefferson

The Squirrel Nut Zippers

Blind Willie Johnson

Camille de Saint-Saens

Bach

Paganini

Djele Lankandia

Gorillaz

Dick Dale

Cake

Blog Policy

The opinions expressed here are my own and do not reflect the influence of evil feline overlords, megalomaniacal chinchillas, or Karl Rove's Zionist mindrays. All comments are subject to posting. Inane, vicious, anti-Semitic, "progressive," and cakesniffy comments are subject to merciless, juvenile public mockery and refutation.

NOTICE In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C., section 107, some material on this web site is provided without permission from the copyright owner, only for purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research under the "fair use" provisions of federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed further, except for "fair use" non-profit educational purposes, without permission of the copyright owner.(Notice copied from William Teach)

blog policy

Testimonials

"He's like a cross between Matt Colt of Eurabian Times and Hunter S. Thompson at his most lucid... Tom is out there running down the enemies of our civilization in a Ford Fairlane--steering wheel in one hand and a bottle of Wild Turkey in the other. Go and visit, but don't make him mad."
- Someguy

"Tom is a chinese communist spy! He has lots of cats and noodles because that is his primary food supply and who but a communist would talk about economics so much? Anyhow I am working with deep cover anti-covert intellegence guys right now to bring him down. The reason we havent yet is because his stupied antisemtic dog Jack wont stop barking at me, making it very difficult to approach his trailer."
- My arch-enemy

"This blog moves faster and is more diverse than any hamster."
- Scriptor

"Tom, you sniveling, shark carcass smelling, paramecium guzzling, tarantula loving demophobe."
-Soundboyz

"Tom is a great writer, and a scary smart thinker. You're right, don't get him mad at you. You'll end up in bloody ribbons. If not because of him, then because of one of his freaking cats."
- Pastorius

"When I don't have any ideas of my own I always head to Hamstermotor. It keeps me hip and I don’t have to think for my self."
-Kevin Watkins

"Don't you just love that Tom? I do. I want to take him home and squeeze him he's so smart."
- Oddybobo

"Quit trying to impress everybody, you snot-nosed little college student... damn meddling kids."
-Two Dogs

"Stop hurting me, Tom. It's enough for me to go through life fat, drunk and stupid."
-Two Dogs

"Good Lord, I do believe Tom scares me."
-Boudicca

See more testimonials

Libertarian and Economist Posse

Libertarians

Travis Benning 2.0
Blog War
Life, Liberty, and Property
Geosciblog
Catallarchy
Anti-Collective
Liberty Dog 3.0
Mean Ol' Meany
Ogre's View
The Austrian Economists Blog
Cafe Hayek
The Angry Economist
Adam Smith Institute Blog
Adam Smithee
The Knowledge Problem
Eric Grumbles Before the Grave
One Billion Red Chinese and a Dog Named Liberty
Old Whig's Brain Dump
The Volokh Conspiracy
Patterico's Pontifications
A Yobbo's View
Agorophilia
Powers Not Delegated
Propaganda Machine
Sound Off: the blog of Sean Rife
Wilson Fu Weblog
Ashish's Niti
Liberty For Sale
Defcon:Blog
That's Ridonkulous!
LP Platform Reform
Daily Pundit
The Egoist
Libertybob
The Libertarian Samizdata
The Austro-Athenian Empire
Pragmatic Libertarian
Truck and Barter
Cantillon's Paradise
Classical Values
Strange Justice
Envirospin Watch
Freeman: Libertarian Critter
Libertopia
The Unrepentant Individual
The Neolibertarian Network

Economists

Coyote Blog
Watchful Investor
A Constrained Vision
Austrian Addiction
Conjectures and Refutations
The Eclectic Econoclast
Deinychus Antirrhopus
The Skeptical Optimist
Econopundit
Marginal Revolution
New Economist
Club for Growth
The Buggy Professor
Jacqueline Mackie Paisley Passey
Prestopundit
Lost Legacy
EconLog
The Conspiracy to Keep You Poor and Stupid
Division of Labour
Catallaxis
Heavy Lifting
; Capital Freedom
Asymmetrical Info.
Ask Edgeworth

;

Libertarians are an odd bunch. I do not endorse the particular variations in the above blogs, nor do I care whether you get offended. What matters, is what offends you.

Other Bloggy People

Conservative Cat
Laurence Simon Is Full Of Crap
The Fourth Checkraise
Harvey's Bad Example
The Ace of Spades
Protein Wisdom
Wuzzadem
The Platypus Society
IMAO
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Tammy Bruce
Hot Air
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
The Joy of Curmudgeonry
Michelle Malkin
Six Meat Buffet
Frizzen Sparks
Miasmatic Review
Lisaviolet's Diary
Llama Butchers
Basil's Blog
The Pirate's Cove
Bobo Blogger
Phin's blog
My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
Moe's Woes
Flares into Darkness
Vince Aut Morire
The Therapist
Hog On Ice
Geobandy
EvolutionBlog
Confederate Yankee
Insults Unpunished
PJ Media
Beautiful Atrocities
Cake Eater Chronicles
The Belmont Club
Powerline
Wizbang

Wicked Thoughts
Strange Justice
Leslie's Omnibus
What NOT To Do in Asia
The Sneeze
Mitsurugi's Baba Ganouj
Red State Rant
Blackfive
Mind of Mog
The New Editor
Scriptor of Historium
Scriptor of Historium III
Crush Liberalism
Vodkapundit
My Pet Jawa
Right Wing Duck
Stop the ACLU
Polipundit
Evil Pundit
The Astute Blogger
The Goober Queen
Sailor in the Desert
Dane Bramage
Anti-Com.com
New Sisyphus
Strange Women Lying in Ponds
Leatherpenguin
Lady Mac's Musings
Eastcoast Wisdom
The Terriorists
Watcher of Weasels

The Owner's Manual
Blogs For Bush
The UN Observer
Pajamahadin
The Truth Laid Bear
Blogarama
Showcase
Facts of Israel
The Conservative Philosopher
Anal Philosopher (no, not that type)
Kesher Talk
The People's Cube (Formerly Communists for Kerry)
Right Hand of God
Eternal Perspectives
The Internet Haganah
Jihad Watch
Lost INto
Daisy Cutter
Pink Kitty's Scratching Post
Music and Cats
Afghan Warrior: the first Afghani blog
Filtrat(from Denmark)
KRLA live webcast
Martialis: the Epigrammes of Martial

American Flag League

Life, Liberty, and Property

The Alliance
Alternate Blogroll

Counter

viewed *loading* times.