Ray Bradbury said, ""

Thursday, April 28, 2005
Woo hoo! I angered a Keynesian!

I angered my Keynesian Fallacy professor today!


As he was going over the "money multiplier," I pointed out that banks under a fractional reserve system are inherently insolvent, and pointed it out using both his own T-account and Rothbard's examples from The Mystery of Banking.


This is a thing simple enough for a child to understand: You and I deposit a total of $100 in a commercial bank. The bank now holds $100 of our money, and since it is our money, we have the right to reclaim it when we choose. In other words, the bank owes us $100. Now suppose the bank lends out $90. Is it not obvious that the bank can no longer repay its debts to us if we choose to withdraw our money? Is it not obvious that adding more depositors does not change the fact that the bank will not be able to pay someone their own money? Is it not further obvious that each dollar that the bank still has in its vaults, has been essentially lent out more than once? Is it not obvious that the bank is allowed to do what no other business is able to do: to continue to do business while bankrupt?


He responded with a blustery, "if their liabilities exceed their assets, than the government will shut them down. You're wrong."


When I pointed that by definition, under a fractional reserve system the liabilities will exceed assets, and that governments throughout history have, when confronted with bank runs, prevented the people to whom the bank owes money from reclaiming their debts, via "suspensions of specie," rations, and outright lockdowns, while simultaneously forcing people who owe money to the bank, to continue paying their debts, he responded, "well, the FDIC stopped that." I had to point out to him that the FDIC is not an insurance system. It is instead a promise from the government to banks that the printing presses of the Treasury will create money to bail them out in the case their insolvency is realized.  The existence of the FDIC is an acknowledgement that the banking system, unlike every other industry, is operating on a fraudulent basis and is given a government privilege by remaining in business where any other business would be shut down and its owners forced to pay their debts. Instead of the government placing police officers at the doors of banks to keep people from getting their money back, the government has simply shifted toward counterfeiting, just like any typical crook.


This got him angry.  He responded  "no, you're wrong. The FDIC gives money to those banks which need it. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree."


Later in the class, I pointed out that "open market operations." is a weasel-phrase for the outright printing of money out of thin air and the destruction of money. This is obvious: when the Fed buys an asset, unlike the purchases of private individuals who are not counterfeiters, it makes its own money through the Treasury with which to exchange. It is the Fed's production of money which is the crucial element, not the fact that the Fed chooses to disguise this by exchanging this new money for an asset rather than outright bestowing it upon people as gifts.  He simply moved on to the next topic.

Posted by: Tom "The Pooklekufr" Treloar at April 28, 2005 09:49 EST | Permalink | comments (8) |
economics, scruffy college student life

Comments open but moderated. I reserve permission to kill spammers on sight.


Comments:
#1  28 April 2005 - 10:03
 
Oh how I would have loved to be there for that exchange.

Liberty Dog
Anonymous
#2  28 April 2005 - 12:40
 
Oh Tom, you are a dead man. I had to appeal a studio grade after arguing that Frank Lloyd Wright sucked. I backed my arguments with facts, and it still didn't matter.

Good luck, I feel your pain.
Anonymous
#3  28 April 2005 - 17:57
 
Lately I have been thinking about the idea of invisible money, money that doesn't exist but people act like it does and something as already been paid for. Such as buying on credit, you still get the product though you haven't paid the full price and you only promise to. Everybody goes fine and they do everything like the full price as been paid. This creates something I term invisible money, money that simply does not exist in the particular situation. Using the bank example you gave earlier, is it legal for a bank to give someone money out of an account when that money is not there? It would almost be like a loan, except it's not. This is money being taken out of thin air that enters the economy, with absolutely no backing. If this can happen, anyone wonder why the $ is so weak?
Anonymous
#4  29 April 2005 - 01:34
 
Unlogged visitor

Money can be identified by being a final act in a transaction. I give you a dollar for a hotdog, and we never have to see each other again. In contrast, credit cards are not money, because later on you will have to pay in money.

What you call invisible money, is properly inflated money. You see, the Fed buys assets in open market operations. It doesn't matter what these assets are, because the important thing is what the Fed buys them with: money created out of thin air. This money can be either literally counterfeited money which it hands over, or numeraire accounts, which means the Fed just writes in its books a new account for that much money. Either way, the thing of catallactic significance is the creation of money, and the insertion of money into a specific area of the economy. It is obvious that such inflation is not showered upon everyone, but only those who sell assets. These people will have the benefit of being able to use money which did not entail its being first exchanged for a value.

They will benefit from this act just as if they themselves counterfeited the money. And, just as if they counterfeited the money, those whom they trade with will similarly benefit- thus producing the phenomenon whereby those closest to the inflation benefit at the expense of everyone else. It is counterfeiting by proxy of the government.
User: Pooklekufr Contact me View user's mediablog Pooklekufr
#5  29 April 2005 - 08:13
 
Actually (assuming a 10% reserve) if the bank just keeps the $100 in the vault, can't it lend out $900?

I guess the government just allows them to count that extra $900 as an asset since they've just lent it and will get it back. Hopefully before someone else needs it.

Once I read this book on the Fed, Secrets of the Temple I think, I remember it said "the Fed exists to protect banks, not individuals" which I guess we've all just accepted. But ... the author seemed to be of the opinion that that's the only thing the government could really do. Were not runs much more common before?
Anonymous
#6  29 April 2005 - 08:14
 
whoops that was me
Pluto's Dad
Anonymous
#7  29 April 2005 - 11:33
 
Pluto's Dad

Because the bank does not own the money depositors put into it. It is the depositor's money. Assuming the bank holds anything less than 100 percent of the money people place in it, it inherently defrauds those whose money is not there for them to reclaim.

The most thorough examination of the fractional reserve banking system and centralized banking is Murray Rothbard's "The Mystery of Banking"

Indeed, runs on banks whose inherent bankruptcy became known were common. These runs, before the FDIC, were prevented by literally closing down the bank by force and then forcing the bank's debtors to continue to pay. After the FDIC, these runs are less common because now, when a bank comes up short and people begin to suspect that their money isn't there, the FDIC has the Fed print up enough money to cover it and assuage the depositors into an imaginary security.

User: Pooklekufr Contact me View user's mediablog Pooklekufr
#8  29 April 2005 - 11:37
 
"hopefully before someone else needs it."

It is not a matter of whether the bank can successfully estimate how much money people will take out on a given month, and therefore keep at least that much in their vaults. It is a question of even a single dollar of a depositor's money not being there should he wish to reclaim it.
User: Pooklekufr Contact me View user's mediablog Pooklekufr
Comments:
blog pager

This site is a member of WebRing.
To browse visit Here.

My Other Blogs

Pooklekufr Unix

Editor for the Grey Gods

Recent comments

About this blog

Tell the FEC to sod off with the Gadsden Flag

I pledge to disobey the FEC

You're in a No Israel-Bashing Zone

Hamsterwheel graphics by Liberty Dog

Fuzzy hamster and cat graphics by Travis Benning

Metallic hamstermotor graphics by Cooltext

Imageshack

About me

User: Pooklekufr
Name: Tom Treloar
Please allow me to introduce myself. I am a man of little wealth and poor taste.

My Technorati Profile

Gmail
Gmail pic created here

Go check out my old blog

What I'm Reading

Some via the Online Library of Liberty and the
Gutenberg Project:

The Essential Turing

E. T. Jaynes' Probability Theory

F.D. Lewis' Essentials of Theoretical Computer Science

Steven Tanimoto's Elements of Artificial Intelligence

Michael Kearns' The Computational Complexity of Machine Learning

Gregory Chaitin's Metamath: the quest for Omega

Cormen et. al. Introduction to Algorithms

Sanjeed Arora's Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach

Gregory Benford's Cosm

Lou Anders' Futureshocks

S. Dasgupta's Algorithms

What I'm Watching

Be My Netflix Friend

Who I'm Listening to

Miriam Makeba

Skip James

Abbot Kinney Lighthouse Choir

Blind Lemon Jefferson

The Squirrel Nut Zippers

Blind Willie Johnson

Camille de Saint-Saens

Bach

Paganini

Djele Lankandia

Gorillaz

Dick Dale

Cake

Blog Policy

The opinions expressed here are my own and do not reflect the influence of evil feline overlords, megalomaniacal chinchillas, or Karl Rove's Zionist mindrays. All comments are subject to posting. Inane, vicious, anti-Semitic, "progressive," and cakesniffy comments are subject to merciless, juvenile public mockery and refutation.

NOTICE In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C., section 107, some material on this web site is provided without permission from the copyright owner, only for purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research under the "fair use" provisions of federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed further, except for "fair use" non-profit educational purposes, without permission of the copyright owner.(Notice copied from William Teach)

blog policy

Testimonials

"He's like a cross between Matt Colt of Eurabian Times and Hunter S. Thompson at his most lucid... Tom is out there running down the enemies of our civilization in a Ford Fairlane--steering wheel in one hand and a bottle of Wild Turkey in the other. Go and visit, but don't make him mad."
- Someguy

"Tom is a chinese communist spy! He has lots of cats and noodles because that is his primary food supply and who but a communist would talk about economics so much? Anyhow I am working with deep cover anti-covert intellegence guys right now to bring him down. The reason we havent yet is because his stupied antisemtic dog Jack wont stop barking at me, making it very difficult to approach his trailer."
- My arch-enemy

"This blog moves faster and is more diverse than any hamster."
- Scriptor

"Tom, you sniveling, shark carcass smelling, paramecium guzzling, tarantula loving demophobe."
-Soundboyz

"Tom is a great writer, and a scary smart thinker. You're right, don't get him mad at you. You'll end up in bloody ribbons. If not because of him, then because of one of his freaking cats."
- Pastorius

"When I don't have any ideas of my own I always head to Hamstermotor. It keeps me hip and I don’t have to think for my self."
-Kevin Watkins

"Don't you just love that Tom? I do. I want to take him home and squeeze him he's so smart."
- Oddybobo

"Quit trying to impress everybody, you snot-nosed little college student... damn meddling kids."
-Two Dogs

"Stop hurting me, Tom. It's enough for me to go through life fat, drunk and stupid."
-Two Dogs

"Good Lord, I do believe Tom scares me."
-Boudicca

See more testimonials

Libertarian and Economist Posse

Libertarians

Travis Benning 2.0
Blog War
Life, Liberty, and Property
Geosciblog
Catallarchy
Anti-Collective
Liberty Dog 3.0
Mean Ol' Meany
Ogre's View
The Austrian Economists Blog
Cafe Hayek
The Angry Economist
Adam Smith Institute Blog
Adam Smithee
The Knowledge Problem
Eric Grumbles Before the Grave
One Billion Red Chinese and a Dog Named Liberty
Old Whig's Brain Dump
The Volokh Conspiracy
Patterico's Pontifications
A Yobbo's View
Agorophilia
Powers Not Delegated
Propaganda Machine
Sound Off: the blog of Sean Rife
Wilson Fu Weblog
Ashish's Niti
Liberty For Sale
Defcon:Blog
That's Ridonkulous!
LP Platform Reform
Daily Pundit
The Egoist
Libertybob
The Libertarian Samizdata
The Austro-Athenian Empire
Pragmatic Libertarian
Truck and Barter
Cantillon's Paradise
Classical Values
Strange Justice
Envirospin Watch
Freeman: Libertarian Critter
Libertopia
The Unrepentant Individual
The Neolibertarian Network

Economists

Coyote Blog
Watchful Investor
A Constrained Vision
Austrian Addiction
Conjectures and Refutations
The Eclectic Econoclast
Deinychus Antirrhopus
The Skeptical Optimist
Econopundit
Marginal Revolution
New Economist
Club for Growth
The Buggy Professor
Jacqueline Mackie Paisley Passey
Prestopundit
Lost Legacy
EconLog
The Conspiracy to Keep You Poor and Stupid
Division of Labour
Catallaxis
Heavy Lifting
; Capital Freedom
Asymmetrical Info.
Ask Edgeworth

;

Libertarians are an odd bunch. I do not endorse the particular variations in the above blogs, nor do I care whether you get offended. What matters, is what offends you.

Other Bloggy People

Conservative Cat
Laurence Simon Is Full Of Crap
The Fourth Checkraise
Harvey's Bad Example
The Ace of Spades
Protein Wisdom
Wuzzadem
The Platypus Society
IMAO
The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Tammy Bruce
Hot Air
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
The Joy of Curmudgeonry
Michelle Malkin
Six Meat Buffet
Frizzen Sparks
Miasmatic Review
Lisaviolet's Diary
Llama Butchers
Basil's Blog
The Pirate's Cove
Bobo Blogger
Phin's blog
My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
Moe's Woes
Flares into Darkness
Vince Aut Morire
The Therapist
Hog On Ice
Geobandy
EvolutionBlog
Confederate Yankee
Insults Unpunished
PJ Media
Beautiful Atrocities
Cake Eater Chronicles
The Belmont Club
Powerline
Wizbang

Wicked Thoughts
Strange Justice
Leslie's Omnibus
What NOT To Do in Asia
The Sneeze
Mitsurugi's Baba Ganouj
Red State Rant
Blackfive
Mind of Mog
The New Editor
Scriptor of Historium
Scriptor of Historium III
Crush Liberalism
Vodkapundit
My Pet Jawa
Right Wing Duck
Stop the ACLU
Polipundit
Evil Pundit
The Astute Blogger
The Goober Queen
Sailor in the Desert
Dane Bramage
Anti-Com.com
New Sisyphus
Strange Women Lying in Ponds
Leatherpenguin
Lady Mac's Musings
Eastcoast Wisdom
The Terriorists
Watcher of Weasels

The Owner's Manual
Blogs For Bush
The UN Observer
Pajamahadin
The Truth Laid Bear
Blogarama
Showcase
Facts of Israel
The Conservative Philosopher
Anal Philosopher (no, not that type)
Kesher Talk
The People's Cube (Formerly Communists for Kerry)
Right Hand of God
Eternal Perspectives
The Internet Haganah
Jihad Watch
Lost INto
Daisy Cutter
Pink Kitty's Scratching Post
Music and Cats
Afghan Warrior: the first Afghani blog
Filtrat(from Denmark)
KRLA live webcast
Martialis: the Epigrammes of Martial

American Flag League

Life, Liberty, and Property

The Alliance
Alternate Blogroll

Counter

viewed *loading* times.